MMSL X:X | DOI: 10.31482/mmsl.2025.004

BLOOD DONOR MOTIVATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND MOTIVATIONAL FACTORSOriginal article

Pavlína Rabasová ORCID...1*, Karel Pavlica ORCID...1, Roman Pospíšil ORCID...1, Hana Konečná ORCID...2, Zuzana Čermáková ORCID...3
1 Department of Health and Social Studies, Faculty of Social Studies, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
2 Institute of the Humanities in Helping Professions, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
3 Blood Centre of University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic

Introduction: The motivation of donors to donate substances of human origin, such as blood and its components, bone marrow, gametes, and others, is influenced by various factors, such as sociodemographic characteristics, motivational factors, and the level of social competence.

Aim: To describe and analyse the motivation of donors to donate blood and blood components in relation to sociodemographic characteristics and motivational factors at the Blood Centre of the University Hospital Ostrava.Design and Methods: Quantitative research based on an anonymous questionnaire survey, followed by inferential analysis of bivariate data. The self-designed questionnaire included 13 questions focusing on motivation to donate, donation experience, anonymity in donation, and sociodemographic data (gender, age, education, size of place of residence, monthly household income, and type of profession).

Results: Six of the nine motivational factors were found to be statistically associated with sociodemographic characteristics. Age influenced attitudes towards commemorative medals (p=0,013). Gender was significant for four factors: the publication of donor lists (p=0,050), special health insurance (p=0,003), media coverage of donor and recipient stories (p=0,000), and more targeted information campaigns (p=0,013). Education was associated with declared donor preference in the event of an organ shortage (p=0,010) and with the publicity of donor lists (p=0,048). Household income was significant in relation to commemorative medals (p=0,000) and declared donor preference in cases of organ shortage (p=0,003). The results of our research supported the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TA CR) research study No. TL05000144, which formulated, for example, basic principles of compensation for donation in the Czech Republic and fundamental recommendations for recruitment campaigns targeting living body part donors.

Conclusions: Motivating donors to donate human substances plays a key role in sustaining the health system and saving lives. Understanding individual donor characteristics and preferences is important for developing motivational strategies to encourage new and existing donors to donate. Our research findings contribute to the targeted sustainability of blood and blood component donation programmes.

Keywords: Substances of Human Origin; Blood and Plasma Donors; Social Determinants; Sociodemographic Characteristics; Motivation

Received: May 26, 2025; Revised: June 25, 2025; Accepted: August 13, 2025; Prepublished online: August 25, 2025 

Download citation

References

  1. Schiller AM, Howard JT, Convertino VA. The physiology of blood loss and shock: New insights from a human laboratory model of haemorrhage. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;242(8):874-883. doi:10.1177/1535370217694099 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1938 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin intended for human application and repealing Directives 2002/98/EC and 2004/23/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. 2024 Jun 13;L1938:1-80. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401938
  3. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky. Nařízení vlády č. 96/2001 Sb., o standardech kvality a bezpečnosti pro látky lidského původu určené k použití u člověka. Zákony pro lidi. 2001. Available from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/ms/2001-96#f5323046
  4. Svatoš R, et al. Kompenzace za dárcovství částí těla v České republice - analýza stavu. Dílčí výstup výzkumného projektu TAČR TL05000144 - Kvalita a udržitelnost programů dárcovství částí těla v ČR, 2021-2023. České Budějovice: Fakulta zdravotnických studií Jihočeské univerzity; 2022. Available from: https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/images/ZSF/veda-a-vyzkum/projekty/VystupyTL05000144_darcovstviCastiTelaCR/kompenzaceDarcovstviCastiTela.pdf
  5. Čermáková Z, Honzová I, Chmel R, et al. Náročnost dárcovských procedur pro živé dárce částí těla. Dílčí výstup výzkumného projektu TAČR TL05000144 - Kvalita a udržitelnost programů dárcovství částí těla v ČR, 2021-2023. České Budějovice: Fakulta zdravotnických studií Jihočeské univerzity; 2022. Available from: https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/images/ZSF/veda-a-vyzkum/projekty/VystupyTL05000144_darcovstviCastiTelaCR/DilciVystup1-NarocnostDarcovskychProcedur.pdf
  6. Zeger G, Selogie E, Shulman IA. Blood donation and collection. In: Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine. 2007. p. 157-82. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-06981-9.50016-8 Go to original source...
  7. Řeháček V, Masopust J, et al. Transfuzní lékařství. 1st ed. Praha: Grada Publishing a.s.; 2013. ISBN 978-80-247-4534-3.
  8. Monteiro TH, Ferreira IJDR, Junior ACFP, et al. Barriers and motivations for blood donation: an integrative review. Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy. 2023;46(3):283-288. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38008595/ Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Motal J. Etický posudek na reklamy shánějící dárce částí těla. Dílčí výstup výzkumného projektu TAČR TL05000144 - Kvalita a udržitelnost programů dárcovství částí těla v ČR, 2021-2023. České Budějovice: Fakulta zdravotnických studií Jihočeské univerzity; 2023. Available from: https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/images/ZSF/veda-a-vyzkum/projekty/zmen_eticky_posudek_imprim_11-09-2023.pdf
  10. Sbírka zákonů České republiky. Vyhláška č. 143/2008 Sb., o stanovení bližších požadavků pro zajištění jakosti a bezpečnosti lidské krve a jejích složek. 2008.
  11. World Health Organization. Blood donor selection: guidelines on assessing donor suitability for blood donation. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
  12. Smith GA, Fisher SA, Dorée C, et al. A systematic review of factors associated with the deferral of donors failing to meet low haemoglobin thresholds. Transfusion Medicine. 2013;23(5):309-320. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tme.12046 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Browne A, Fisher SA, Masconi K, et al. Donor deferral due to low hemoglobin-an updated systematic review. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2020;34(1):10-22. doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.10.002 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Český statistický úřad. Česko v číslech, 2021. Praha: Český statistický úřad; 2021. Available from: https://csu.gov.cz/docs/107508/440b1b80-b9c7-a9d4-012c-ad0fa94df8ec/32020321.pdf?version=1.0
  15. Gumà J, Solé-Auró A, Arpino B. Examining social determinants of health: the role of education, household arrangements and country groups by gender. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(699):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7054-0 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. IHME-CHAIN Collaborators. Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(3):e155-165. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2823%2900306-7 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Český statistický úřad. Sčítání 2021. Praha: Český statistický úřad; 2024. Available from: https://scitani.gov.cz/vzdelani#null
  18. Cimaroli K, Páez A, Newbold KB, et al. Individual and contextual determinants of blood donation frequency with a focus on clinic accessibility: a case study of Toronto, Canada. Health & Place. 2012;18(2):424-433. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.12.005 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Burgdorf KS, Simonsen J, Sundby A, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics of Danish blood donors. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0169112. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169112 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Čeledová L, Holčík J, et al. Nové kapitoly ze sociálního lékařství a veřejného zdravotnictví. 1st ed. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Karolinum; 2017. ISBN 978-80-246-3809-6.
  21. Kajanová A, Řimnáčová Z. Health literacy of the poor. Pomahajuce Profesie. 2019;2(1):5-16. Available from: http://www.pp.fsvaz.ukf.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/5_16_Kajanov%C3%A1_%C5%98imn%C3%A1%C4%8Dov%C3%A1_Health-literacy-of-the-poor.pdf Go to original source...
  22. Ferguson E, Hill A, Lam M, et al. A typology of blood donor motivations. Transfusion. 2020;60(9):2010-20. doi:10.1111/trf.15913 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Záškodná H, Kubicová A. Prosocial behaviour in helping professions. Kontakt. 2008;10(1):150-158. doi:10.32725/kont.2008.021 Go to original source...
  24. Stevens M, Moriarty J, Manthorpe J, et al. Helping others or a rewarding career? Investigating student motivations to train as social workers in England. Journal of Social Work. 2012;12(1):16-36. doi:10.1177/1468017310380085 Go to original source...
  25. Český červený kříž. Typy odběrů krve. 2024. Available from: https://www.cervenykriz.eu/typy-odberu
  26. World Health Organization. Global status report on blood safety and availability 2021. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240051683
  27. Piersma TW, Bekkers R, Klinkenberg EF, et al. Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature. Blood Transfusion. 2017;15(5):382. doi:10.2450/2017.0064-17 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Buciuniene I, Stonienë L, Blazeviciene A, et al. Blood donors' motivation and attitude to non-remunerated blood donation in Lithuania. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):166. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-166 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Misje AH, Bosnes V, Gåsdal O, et al. Motivation, recruitment, and retention of voluntary non-remunerated blood donors: a survey-based questionnaire study. Vox Sanguinis. 2005;89(4):236-44. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00706.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Sojka BN, Sojka P. The blood donation experience: self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sanguinis. 2008;94(1):56-63. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00990.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Bani M, Strepparava MG. Motivation in Italian whole blood donors and the role of commitment. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2011;16(6):641-649. doi:10.1080/13548506.2011.569731 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Trimmel M, Lattacher H, Janda M. Voluntary whole-blood donors, and compensated platelet donors and plasma donors: Motivation to donate, altruism and aggression. Transfusion and Apheresis Science. 2005;33(2):147-155. doi:10.1016/j.transci.2005.03.011 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Godin G, Germain M. How to motivate whole blood donors to become plasma donors. Journal of Blood Transfusion. 2014;2014:752182. doi:10.1155/2014/752182 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Martín-Santana JD, Cabrera-Suárez MK, Deniz-Deniz MDLC, et al. Donor orientation and service quality: Key factors in active blood donors' satisfaction and loyalty. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0255112. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255112 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Český červený kříž. Oceňování bezpříspěvkových dárců krve. 2024. Available from: https://www.cervenykriz.eu/ocenovani-darcu
  36. World Health Organization. Blood donor counselling: implementation guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Chapter 4, Ethical and legal considerations in blood donor counselling. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310579/
  37. Allan S. Donor identification. Victorian legislation gives rights to all donor-conceived people. Family Matters. 2016;(98):43-55. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/fm98-sa_0.pdf
  38. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic No. TL05000144. V4 - Recommendation on the method of compensation in relation to the donation of substances of human origin: Output of the research project TA CR TL05000144 - Quality and sustainability of the body part donation programme in the Czech Republic, 2021-2023. 2023. Available from: https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/images/ZSF/veda-a-vyzkum/projekty/230710_doporuceni-_zpusobu_vypoctu_kompenzaci_2023.pdf
  39. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic No. TL05000144. V5 - Strategy for recruiting living donors of body parts: Proposal of principles. Output of the research project TA CR TL05000144 - Quality and sustainability of the body part donation programme in the Czech Republic, 2021-2023. 2023. Available from: https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/images/ZSF/veda-a-vyzkum/projekty/231031_23_letak_v5_strategie_tacr_kon.pdf